Are Eggs Good Or Bad? How You Should Interpret This Latest Study

Food & Drink

Population cohort studies can show possible associations. But they cannot really show what came first the health outcome or the egg. Photographer: Shannon VanRaes/Bloomberg© 2018 Bloomberg Finance LP

What eggs-actly does this mean?  A study just published in JAMA seemed to give eggs a bit of a beating after they’ve been on a roll since 2015. After all, that year the Dietary Guidelines of America no longer included a recommended limit on the number of eggs that you should eat a week. But does this new study scramble this situation and raise the possibility of such limits returning? Well, here’s a closer egg-amination, which may be a bit punny.

The study laid together data from six different cohorts in the U.S. that had a combined total of 29,615 people who were followed for an average of 17.5 years between between March 25, 1985, and August 31, 2016. During this eggs-tensive time period, these people had a total of 5400 cardiovascular events, which included 2088 coronary artery problems (like a heart attack), 1302 strokes, 1897 heart failure events, and 113 deaths from cardiovascular disease. There were also 6,132 deaths in general or, in other words, eggs-its for a variety of reasons.

The research team then tried to determine if there was an association between the amount of cholesterol and eggs that these people had consumed each day and the likelihood of suffering cardiovascular events or dying during that time period. In their statistical analysis, the team tried to account for factors such as people’s ages, sexes, races, ethnicity, education levels, smoking habits, alcohol intake, physical activity levels, body mass indices (BMIs), blood pressures, lipid levels, use of particular medications, and medical conditions.

The analysis found a correlation between the amount of cholesterol consumed each day and the likelihood of suffering a cardiovascular event and dying. Every 300 mg increase in cholesterol intake each day was associated with a 3.24% higher likelihood of having a cardiovascular event and a 4.43% higher likelihood of dying during that time period.

The analysis also found correlations with the number of eggs consumed each day. For each additional half an egg eaten per day, the likelihood of a cardiovascular event went up by 1.93% and the likelihood of death increased by 0.71%.

So, should this study re-hatch recommended limits on the number of eggs that your should eat a week (some said no more than two) due to the cholesterol in eggs (a typical large egg will contain about 186 mg)? What about the fact that eggs are eggs-ellent sources of protein, vitamin D, choline, lutein, and zeaxanthin without an egg-cessive amount of calories (just 78 an egg)? What about studies that have suggested more sunny-sides of eggs such as the cohort study published in the journal Heart and covering over a half a million people in China In that study, those who ate a moderate amount of eggs (less than one a day) had a lower risk of cardiovascular disease than those who ate no eggs. 

This video summarizes some of the thoughts last year about eggs from the American Heart Association:

While the JAMA and Heart studies may have been relatively well done population cohort studies, there are numerous cracks in such study approaches in general. These types of studies can never really show or determine cause-and-effect. They tend to take large pots of data and try to boil them down to relatively simple correlations or associations. But life is a lot more complex than that. The relationships between a food item and cardiovascular disease involve complex systems, many of which were not really considered or represented in such analyses. For example, how about things such as the job stress or social situations that a person encounters? Both of these can affect a person’s diet as well as his or her cardiovascular risk. What about other components of a person’s diet? Do people who eat more eggs tend to concurrently eat more or less of other things? Moreover, eggs can be prepared in many, many different ways, some healthier (e.g., less salt, less sauce, less yolk, and less oil) than others.

Depending too heavily on such large population cohort studies to develop nutrition recommendations would be the wrong ap-poach. Notice how popular viewpoints about eggs have seemed to run back and forth over the years. That’s because these large cohort studies only provide indirect evidence, no more than shells of what may really be occurring. Nevertheless, every time one of these studies comes out, headlines fry around saying either “eggs are bad” or “eggs are good.” The same has happened to other food and beverage items such as coffee.

In 2017, the National Academies of Science, Medicine, and Engineering convened a committee (of which I was a member) to review the process by which the Dietary Guidelines of America are determined. One of our committee’s recommendations was to use more systems approaches and methods. There are a number of emerging methods such as systems mapping and modeling that can help better account for and delineate the systems that govern the relationship between diet and various health outcomes such as cardiovascular diseases. Such methods can bring together data and information from laboratory studies, animal studies, clinical trials, cohort studies, and other sources and determine how they fit together and try to reconstruct the systems involved. When determining what will happen to the weather or a rocket launch, you don’t just focus on one or two factors and show how these correlate with what may happen. Instead, meteorologists and aerospace engineers build sophisticated computer models and try to simulate what may occur. The same needs to be done more in nutrition research. The next phase in nutrition research should be to dive deeper and better understand these complex systems that may affect how many eggs you should eat. After all, your choice is not simply between eating only eggs versus eating no eggs at all.

So, for now, omletting any strong recommendations about how many eggs you can and should eat go. The recommended limit depends on a lot of different factors and probably varies from person to person. In general, moderation and balance are quiche for a healthy diet. You don’t want to eat an egg-cessive number of eggs but you also don’t have to completely eggs-lude eggs from your diet, unless of course you are vegetarian or vegan. Keep in mind that eggs can offer important nutrients but also have cholesterol. Your decision about how many eggs to eat should depend on a number of factors such as your other possible sources of protein, vitamin D, other nutrients, and cholesterol as well as the way you are preparing the eggs. While setting recommended daily intake limits for nutrients such as sugar and salt may be easier (but by no means over easy), doing so with whole food items such as eggs is more challenging. There is still much to be learned about the complex systems connecting the different aspects of a food item with health outcomes. Hopefully all of this will egg on changes in how nutrition research is conducted.

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

Historic Wineries Near You: From Napa to New York
These are the best places to eat in Rome, according to chef Cristina Bowerman
Subway Construction Over, New York’s Little Frog Bistro Gets A Fresh Start
Mop Fixes Engine | UK Roadtrip Day 7
10 historic haciendas for a slice of timeless Mexico

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *